Victim/Client Sherri Fulton on an Unauthorized use of a vehicle criminal case reached out to me and made me aware that on Friday, 1/3/25 adverse party, Calvin Denton, had stolen the title from an office desk of a tenant and has changed the title into his name as well as trying to claim the vehicle from the storage facility. Client Sheri made a police report and tried to contact DMV to stop the title change as she did not sell the vehicle.
Victim is an ice cream shop owner located next to adverse party and neighboring barber shop owner. Victim has an active criminal case in which she is a listed victim, adverse party will not stop harassing and affecting victim's place of business--victim has made the building manager aware of the active case and reason she requests to terminate her building lease. Victim has been told by the building manager that she cannot break her 5-year lease, or the building manager will sue her--manager aware of the active case and adverse party's behavior.
Sheila is Betty's daughter and also neighbor. Betty is scared, and would like a protective order in place, she was under the impression that she didn't need one.
Sarena is the victim in a case that was dismissed against her dad today. The original charge was AFV impede breath. She no longer has bond conditions or a protective order in place. She has already tried for a protective order once but was thrown out. The other major issue is the land she lives on. It is deeded to an aunt, but the aunt doesn't live there. She was given permission by the aunt to live there but fighting with her dad\defendant over the property. Sarena's mom died due to overdose when Sarena was very young. Dad and his girlfriend have continued to cheat the system in an
Victim stated that defendant’s mother filed victim and defendant’s tax return as married, filing jointly. They are, however, not married. They were engaged to be married but the wedding was postponed. The victim was using a car that D had purchased for her to use.
She’d like to know what legal rights she has to the car, as well as property that was left in the rental home that she and D both resided in.
The victim in this case is very young, Relay, his grandparents have been my main point of contact. They're needing assistance with the eviction process and also with protective order questions. Defendant is the father of the victim and has an extensive criminal history. The victim had his eye socket fractured from this assault. He lives with his grandparents.
Mr. Est was assaulted by his roommate. That was somehow missed in the booking process so he was not granted an emergency protective order. He is concerned about he and his wife's safety due to their age and the defendant being significantly younger than them. The defendant has pled and sentenced to 45 days in the Montgomery County jail. He does not have an email address.
The victim in this case had several thousand dollars essentially stolen from her, at this time it's a misdemeanor charge. I believe she is wanting assistance with going after the defendant to sue him civilly. I did make her aware that eligibility is based off of income.
This defendant now has three charges total involving this victim. The initial AFV and has now picked up VPO and CT. She was not given an EPO initially because it was a warrant case. She was apprehensive about applying because she was told she had to qualify. I explained what that means so she is more interested in trying now but still has questions. The defendant uses his children to get the victim to give in to him.
Joy (goes by Giga) was assaulted by her husband - initially she wanted to drop the assault charges. However, he returned to her apartment after being released from jail and essentially held her captive for a week while planning a murder suicide. She was able to break free while taking her dog for a walk and called 911 for help. She is wanting to apply for a final protective order and needs assistance.